09 / 08 / 2026

Trump’s Tariffs and the Future of Global Trade


By Nada Ismail


This week’s key terms/concepts:

• Tariffs: The taxes placed on imported goods, usually to make foreign products more expensive.

• Economic protectionism: Government policies designed to protect domestic businesses from foreign competition.

• Corporate restructuring: The process of changing a company’s structure or operations to improve performance or reduce costs.

President Donald Trump has unveiled another set of tariffs on imports from some of the world’s largest trading partners, in one of the biggest changes in US trade policy in years. The latest measure imposes additional tariffs ranging from 10% to 12.5% on all goods on 60 trading partners, including neighbours Canada and Mexico, China, the UK, the European Union. The measures have a broader impact on a wide variety of imported products and are meant to stimulate domestic manufacturing, protect American industries, and lessen trade deficits.

Trump has since unveiled a further 50% tariff on Canadian goods, including agricultural and dairy products, which is due to take effect on the 19th of this month. Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney has stated that ‘all options’ are available in retaliation for the tariffs. Earlier this week, a coalition of 25 US stated sued the Trump administration over the new wave of tariffs, with New York Governor Kathy Hochul describing the decision as a “tax on hardworking families”.

Why is this significant?


The new tariffs will undoubtedly change the nature of international trade by putting a higher price on imports and exports, and will likely make it more attractive for companies to look at manufacturing and sourcing options. Businesses that are using imported parts may be pushed to incur high operating expenses, to renegotiate contracts, or to move manufacturing entirely to other countries not impacted by the duties.

The measures also pose important legal issues under international trade law. Tariffs could lead to uncertainty for multinational businesses, as countries impacted by tariffs can respond with international dispute processes or impose retaliatory tariffs.

The tariffs could have implications for investors with regard to merger and acquisitions, as well as foreign investment and corporate restructuring to reduce exposure to the potential new trade barriers. Sectors likely to be hardest hit are automotive, technology, pharmaceuticals, and consumer goods.

On a larger scale, the declaration is part of a wider trend of governments turning away from free trade in favour of economic protectionism. In the new commercial landscape, geopolitics is thus a far greater factor in commercial decision-making for businesses.

What impact does this have on law firms?


New tariffs will generate significant legal demand across a variety of areas. International trade attorneys will provide counsel to businesses regarding customs laws, tariff classification, and import laws. Commercial lawyers may be engaged to review current supply contracts to consider how costs might be shifted between the parties, or if there are force majeure, hardship clauses, or provisions for price adjustments.

A further source of dispute may arise where tariff increases render contractual requirements commercially impractical, triggering litigation or arbitration. In parallel, competition, corporate, and employment lawyers could be engaged, as companies restructure their businesses, relocate manufacturing sites, and/or pursue acquisitions to reinforce domestic supply lines.

The tariffs illustrate how quickly government policy changes can generate substantial new demand for legal services, as firms who operate across the globe must navigate a growing, complex international trade environment.

The situation now awaits Canada’s response on August 19th and whether it will introduce retaliatory tariffs.


Subscribe for Lex Weekly articles in your inbox – stay commercially aware on the go.